Even though the body behaves as a kinetic chain, simplifying the dynamic movement assessment while not specifying the type of upper extremity injury is not favorable for the clinician to identify previous injury.ĭiagnosis of a potential counterintuitive variable observed through a dynamic movement assessment, which directly affects an overhead athlete’s upper extremity health, should be of interest to coaches and practitioners alike. In conclusion, examining only trunk flexion and upper leg elevation during the tuck jump assessment (TJA) is not enough for clinicians to recognize previous upper extremity injury. A logistic regression showed no significance in trunk flexion or upper leg elevation in the ability to determine upper extremity injury ( (Innovative Sports Training, Chicago, IL, USA). , Ascension Technologies, Inc., Burlington, VT, USA) synced with the MotionMonitor Kinematic data were collected from jumps 4 through 8 during a trial of 10 tuck jumps performed at 100 Hz using an electromagnetic tracking system (trakSTAR 161.98☑3.65 cm 59.17 ± 14.90 kg) were recruited to participate and were placed in either the previous injury (N=18) or no previous injury (N=53) groups. Seventy-one youth baseball and softball athletes (28 baseball/43 softball 12.41☒.22 yrs. The purpose of this study was to determine if tuck jumps can be used as a dynamic movement assessment to ascertain a previous history of upper extremity injury in an overhead throwing sport.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |